for
New
Submissions
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
STANDARD
OPERATING PROCEDURES
FOR NEW SUBMISSIONS
I. OVERVIEW
II. ACCESS THE APPLICATION
III. APPLICATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
IV. THE PROTOCOL
V. VOTING OPTIONS
VI. OTHER OPTIONS
I. OVERVIEW:
All individuals
at Howard University, seeking to conduct research involving human
participant(s), as defined in 45 CFR 46.102 (d)(f) and 21 CFR 50.3
(c)(g), must first have their research proposals approved by the Howard
University Institutional Review Board (HUIRB) prior to the initiation
of the study. The HUIRB operates in compliance with the Department
of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Office of Human Research Protections
(OHRP) regulations for the protection of human research participants,
including 45 CFR 46, 21 CFR 50 and 21 CFR 56, which govern human participant
research as amended to include the Common Rule (FR 56, No. 117, 28002).
The HUIRB operates under the Federal Wide Assurance No. 00000891 which
expires November 30, 2009.
The HUIRB
will review and oversee all research involving human participants
at the University and is authorized to inspect research facilities,
obtain records, observe the consent process, suspend or terminate
research, and take other actions as necessary to comply with federal
regulations. The HUIRB is also responsible for providing assurance
to the federal government that Howard University is in compliance
with federal regulations. Further detailed instructions regarding
HUIRB responsibilities, procedures and regulations can be found in
the HUIRB website www.huirb.howard.edu.
Research activity MUST NOT PROCEED UNTIL: 1) The University’s
IRB has reviewed and approved the research proposal; 2) An official
letter has been issued to the research investigator by the Chairman
or designee of the Board; and/or, 3) the research investigator is
in possession of IRB-approved consent documents as well as any accompanying
recruitment materials, if applicable.
In the
event that research is undertaken without the intention of involving
human participants, but it is later proposed to involve human participants
in the research, the above review and approval procedures must be
followed prior to instituting the human participant research.
NOTE:
All research that is conducted involving human participants must be
reviewed by the HUIRB. Although some types of research on human participants
may be eligible for an exemption, under federal regulations. Such
exemptions can only be determined by the HUIRB.
II. ACCESS
THE APPLICATION:
Obtain
the Application for Projects Involving Human Participants from the
HUIRB website - www.huirb.howard.edu.
III.
APPLICATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS:
Select
the type of Application to be completed.
A.
If it is a funded research project (the application has already
been completed for the funding agency/source), a few component parts
must be completed. These “parts” include but are not
limited to: a study protocol, the Human Participants Section for
the Howard University participants and possibly a consent document.
B.
If it is a doctoral/thesis project (the dissertation or thesis)
application has already been completed, a few component parts must
be completed. These “parts” include but are not limited
to: the Human Participants Section for the Howard University participants
and possibly a consent document.
C.
If it is a chart review or if archival data is being used, an application
is still required. The determination of the exempt status of a project
is the responsibility of the HUIRB. All activities involving humans
in any way must be submitted to the Board for review.
THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE TYPED.
The
“Face Page” of the application must be signed by the
following:
- Principal Investigator (PI)/Faculty Advisor (FA)
- PI’s /FA’s Departmental Chairperson
- PI’s /FA’s Dean
NOTE:
Student Investigators are not required to sign the Face Page.
The PI/FA
must provide an e-mail address. If the application involves a Student
Investigator (S), their name, telephone number and e-mail address
should also be listed on the Face Page.
If the
proposed project is being undertaken by a Graduate Degree Candidate
in partial requirement for the Master’s or Ph.D. degree, a document
from the appropriate School’s or College’s Thesis/Dissertation
Committee must be included. Projects from Post-Doctoral Candidates
must have an accompanying letter of approval from their sponsor.
NOTE: The HUIRB ONLY accepts protocols from Howard University faculty
members. Students, staff, or other non-faculty investigators must
identify a Howard University faculty member who agrees to be responsible
for oversight of the research protocol.
IV. THE
PROTOCOL:
One (1)
original and three (3) copies of the completed protocol (including
attachments and instruments) should be forwarded to the HUIRB Office
located in Annex II, which is located at 515 W Street, N.W., Room
214. (See Investigator’s Checklist for layout)
Under
normal circumstances the HUIRB reviews protocols every first and third
Wednesday of every month except December. The deadline for submissions
is the preceding Thursday at 5:00 p.m. (Consult web page for the IRB
meeting schedule.)
V. VOTING
OPTIONS
APPROVE:
Recommended when protocols meet all qualifications for
compliance.
APPROVE
WITH MINOR OR ADMINISTRATIVE REVISIONS:
Recommended when slight modifications or clarifications are required
to bring the protocol into
compliance. May be handled administratively upon a
satisfactory written response by the PI to the Board’s
critique.
REVISE:
Recommended when major modifications are required
that will result in alteration of protocol content. Only the
requested revisions are necessary. Must be submitted to
the full Board for consideration.
DEFER:
Recommended when additional information is required
for a more accurate determination or if information is
missing or not enough information was included to make
an accurate determination. Must be resubmitted to the
full Board for consideration.
DISAPPROVE:
Recommended when the proposal has significant
deficiencies and does not meet the requirements for
compliance. A new protocol must be submitted for full Board consideration.
EXEMPT:
Recommended when the protocol does not involve
human participants except as unidentifiable chart or
record (chart) review.
When submitting revisions, provide four copies of the revisions (highlighted
or underlined as appropriate), not the entire application. In addition,
a cover letter signed by the PI/FA should accompany all revisions.
VI. OTHER
OPTIONS:
ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW:
Recommended when there is an urgent request for review. The determination
is made on an individual basis at the Chairman’s discretion.
NOTE: Drug studies can not be
administratively reviewed.
EXPEDITED
REVIEW:
Recommended when the PI/FA forwards a written
request to review outside of the normal review
process with an appropriate
explanation/justification.
NOTE: Drug studies can not be expedited
reviewed.
Slight modification(s) or clarification(s) should be detailed in a
letter to the IRB Chairman. The letter then becomes an addendum to
the original application.
May,
2007
ASSURANCES